YieldMax Dropped a Bombshell: Reverse Splits = Diaster?
YieldMax just announced reverse splits across 12 ETFs. Here’s what’s happening, how it affects my portfolio, and why I’m not panicking.
ULTY & TSLY Reverse Split Explained — And What It Means for Income Investors Like Us
Recently, YieldMax dropped a major announcement: a series of reverse splits across 12 of their high-yield, single-stock covered call ETFs.
If you’re holding ULTY, TSLY, or any of the YieldMax funds for income — especially if you’re using them as part of a margin-supported income strategy like I do — this is important to understand.
Today’s post breaks down:
What a reverse split actually is
Why YieldMax is doing this
How my ULTY and TSLY positions will change
Whether income will be affected
My updated thoughts as a Singapore dividend investor using margin responsibly
What YieldMax Just Announced
YieldMax and Tidal have officially filed to implement reverse splits on the following ETFs.
🔟 One-for-Ten (1:10) Reverse Splits
Every 10 old shares become 1 new share.
ULTY — Ultra Option Income Strategy ETF
CRSH — Short TSLA Option Income ETF
DIPS — Short NVDA Option Income ETF
FIAT — Short COIN Option Income ETF
MRNY — MRNA Option Income ETF
AIYY — AI Option Income ETF
CONY — COIN Option Income ETF
🖐 One-for-Five (1:5) Reverse Splits
Every 5 old shares become 1 new share.
YBIT — Bitcoin Option Income ETF
TSLY — Tesla Option Income ETF
XYZY — XYZ Option Income ETF
ABNY — ABNB Option Income ETF
OARK — Innovation Option Income ETF
Do you need to do anything?
No.
Reverse splits happen automatically inside your brokerage account.
You’ll simply wake up to:
Fewer shares
A higher share price
The same total value
Nothing gets bought or sold manually.
Why YieldMax Is Doing This (And Why It’s Not a Dividend Cut)
When ETF prices fall too low — usually near the $3 threshold — several problems happen:
Liquidity drops
Volatility spikes
Brokers may increase margin maintenance to 100%
Some platforms stop showing the ETF in screeners
Funds risk delisting or structural constraints
A reverse split resets the price back to a healthier level.
It does not:
Fix NAV erosion
Change the ETF’s investment strategy
Cut (or increase) dividends
Alter long-term performance
It’s simply a mathematical restructuring, not a fundamental change in the fund.
Think of it like upgrading the size of the chips in a vending machine:
same total chips, just fewer bigger packets.
How This Impacts My Portfolio
📌 My ULTY Position
3,000 shares at $6 average cost
After 1:10 split → 300 shares
New cost basis → $60 per share
Total cost basis stays the same: $18,000
📌 My TSLY Position
333 shares at $7.70 average cost
After 1:5 split → ~66 shares
New cost basis → $38.50 per share
Total cost basis remains unchanged
📌 What about income?
Reverse splits do NOT reduce total income.
If ULTY used to pay $0.09 per share:
Pre-split: 3,000 × $0.09 = $270
Post-split: 300 × $0.90 = $270
Same total distribution.
Just a cleaner price structure.
Does This Affect Margin?
Yes — but in a good way.
If ULTY or TSLY kept drifting lower, brokers could easily reclassify them as:
“Low-priced, high-volatility securities”
…which often raises maintenance margin to 100% or 100% cash-only.
That means:
Forced liquidations become more likely
You lose the ability to withdraw
Your portfolio’s safety buffer shrinks
By resetting the price higher, the fund remains within healthy margin classification.
As someone who uses margin responsibly —
my margin loan is only USD $7.8K against a USD $137K portfolio —
this helps keep my strategy stable.
My Strategy Moving Forward
I still believe in my income flywheel:
Deposit
Invest
Collect weekly distributions
Pay down margin
Repeat
This reverse split does not change that.
My updated plan:
Continue holding ULTY and TSLY
Position sizes remain controlled (10–20% max exposure)
Keep monitoring NAV behaviour after the reset
Track whether post-split distributions remain stable
Reverse splits are not a bullish sign — they’re simply a structural reset, not an indication of the fund’s health improving.
But for income investors, especially margin-supported income investors, they are not automatically bad either.
Final Thoughts
Reverse splits sound scary.
I get it — most people associate them with dying stocks.
But for YieldMax’s structure, especially for weekly-paying income ETFs, it’s just housekeeping. A way to keep everything functioning inside the system.
Your total value doesn’t change.
Your income doesn’t disappear.
Your strategy does not suddenly break.
And if you’re diversified and using margin safely, these changes are manageable.
If you’re holding any YieldMax ETF from the list above, everything will update automatically. No action is required on your part.
Disclaimer:
This content is for education and personal sharing only. Nothing in this post is financial advice, investment advice, or a recommendation to buy or sell any security. I am not a licensed financial adviser. All investing involves risk, including the potential loss of capital. Please do your own research or consult a qualified financial professional before making any financial decisions. My portfolio, strategies, and results may not be suitable for your situation.





I have never seen a Reverse Split I liked ergo profited from. In addition, the continued ROC included in dividends concerned me greatly. Something just doesn't seem right. A phony way of providing a higher dividend IMHO. My YieldMax portfolio has provided exceptionally high dividends while PPS has diminished greatly. The ramifications of such is costly at income tax time.